The might of the government of India is most willingly lent using the umbrella of anti-Hindu sacrilegious provisions of the Indian Constitution - Articles 25 to Articles 30 - which give knockdown priority to the minority religious groups vis-à-vis the Hindus in numerical majority.
Example No.1: On 6 December, 1992, Babri Masjid in Ayodhya was demolished. This ‘ACTION’ created a vicious ‘REACTION’ triggering widespread riots, arson, murders and killings across the country. Thousands of houses were burnt, scores and scores of people were killed and hundreds were injured. In the scale and scope of sheer viciousness, this ‘reaction’ was vastly more deadly than what happened later in Gujarat after the Godhra incident in 2002. The interesting thing to note is that the rumblings of this ‘ACTION’ at Ayodhya keeps resurfacing and reverberating in the national media.
On the other hand, any mention about the ‘REACTION’, despite its viciousness, has simply disappeared from the agenda of the media. Thus, the public memory of the ‘ACTION’ is still being perpetuated and kept alive for pseudo-secular vote bank purposes while the memory of the ‘REACTION’ has been cleverly obliterated. I can only say with conviction that the controlling men in the mafia of mass media are united in their resolve to destroy the cultural and racial memories and heritage of the Hindus of India.
What has been collectively suppressed by the media is the fact that 59 innocent persons (all Hindus) and mostly women and children were roasted alive in a railway coach near Godhra by a horde of Muslims functioning as terrorists in February 2002. This ‘ACTION’ created a vicious ‘REACTION’, causing large-scale arson and killing of scores and scores of human lives and wounding of several hundreds.
Interestingly enough, in this case the ‘ACTION’ (Godhra massacre) has long since been consigned into oblivion in the national media but the rumblings of the ‘REACTION’ are kept reverberating with great passion even today.
Singhal beautifully sums up the anti-Hindu and anti-Sanatana Dharma position taken by the mafia of mass media in a graphic manner: ‘In other words, in the first case (Ayodhya) the rumblings of the ‘ACTION’ are being perpetuated in the media with great passion, while the ‘REACTION’ has been cast away into oblivion. In the second case (Godhra Massacre), the rumblings of the ‘REACTION’ are being perpetuated by the media with clock-like precision and passion, but the ‘ACTION’ has long since been cast away into oblivion.’
The organised and criminal anti-social and anti-national conduct of the national dailies in particular and most forms of the electronic media, becomes obvious when we clearly see the patent fact that wherever the Hindus show up as villains, that event is perpetuated for years and years without end in the media. BUT, where the Muslims show up as arch-villains those events are under-played and buried deep as fast as possible. In essence, therefore, whenever and wherever, the Muslims are even the marginal sufferers the media ‘suffers’ (at any rate feigns to suffer along with pseudo-secular politicians!) with them and seems determined to keep alive the public memories about their wounds.
On the other hand, where the Hindus are the sufferers, the media shows an attitude of indifference and contempt towards their feelings and sufferings. It goes out of its way to underplay and blank out with electronic speed in all forms of mass media all the dastardly memories relating to the assault on the Hindus.
Against this background, one wonders if the minorities in any other country can get even half as generous or sympathetic a dispensation from their country’s media in comparison with what the Muslims have enjoyed and continue to the enjoy in independent India.
Example No.2: The reporting on Gujarat riots in the national English media and most of TV channels.
a) On the very first day of the riots on 28 February, 2002, 10 Hindu rioters had been shot and 16 Hindus were wounded by police bullets. As many as 5,450 rounds had been fired on the first day. (It may be noted here that at Jallianwala Bagh only 1,500 bullets were fired on Indians by General Dyer in April 1919!)
b) With the first three days, 34 Hindu rioters had been killed and 56 were wounded in police firing. In the worst affected areas, shoot at sight orders had also been issued.
c) In all, 80 Hindus were shot dead and 207 were wounded by police bullets?
Against this factual background, Singhal, former Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh (who is no less qualified to speak on this subject than the pseudo-secular anti-Hindu vermin in the mafia of mass media) asks the following unanswerable questions:
If Modi had indeed ordered the police to look the other way as suggested by the media, how did so many casualties of Hindus occur through police bullets?
How did the mass media deliberately miss or overlook or ignore the Himalayan fact that a total of 10,500 rounds of bullets and 15,000 tear-smoke shells were fired during the riot days in Gujarat?
Was this a sign of deliberate inaction by the government of Gujarat?
Why are these known official figures treated as figments of imagination and the facts dismissed as ‘manufactured communal opinions’ by the men in the media?
The mafia of mass media reported like Pakistani spies that Army assistance was called for by Narendra Modi AFTER THREE DAYS. The stark fact is that ARMY ASSISTANCE was sought on the very first day, i.e. 28 February, 2002 and the ARMY REINFORCEMENTS arrived the same night by plane. On instructions from Gujarat government, it was immediately deployed on the first of March, 2002 at 11.00 am. The organised criminals in the media ‘counted’ with pseudo-secular political precision based on pseudo-secular congress-communist criminal nexus ‘three (3) days’ from 28 February to 1 March, 2002 conveniently forgetting that February in 2002 had only 28 days. I have no doubt that our robbers and dacoits in the mass media would love to refer this simple truth to the Imam of Jumma Masjid or the Pope in Rome or to Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi for a final non-communal decision regarding the authenticity of this simple arithmetic/mathematics.
The pseudo-secular Goebbels in the mass media made out that what happened in Gujarat was a pogrom- whole sale campaign of one-sided killing and arson by Hindus against the Muslims. They mischievously closed their non-seeing and voluntarily blind eyes to the fact that as early as on 5 March, 2002, 98 refugee camps were housing the Muslim refugees and as many as 13 refugee camps were housing the Hindu refugees. Therefore, TO SAY THAT RIOTS IN GUJARAT WERE A ONE-SIDED AFFAIR IS NOTHING BUT GROSS ORCHESTRATED FALSEHOOD.
From the facts stated above, it should be clear that the Constitutional provisions, administrative actions by the government of India or the dispensation that Muslims have been receiving in independent India from the judiciary, the National Human Rights Commission or the mass media do not permit us to find the source of the many social ills of the Muslims among the above institutions of the State or society.
Singhal also dismisses the popular theory prevalent in the mass media that the Muslims in India are living in perpetual threat and are being treated as ‘second class citizens’. If that were indeed so, the Muslims of India need to explain how two crores of Bangladeshi Muslims and over a lakh of illegal Muslim immigrants from Pakistan and another 80,000 Muslims who came from Pakistan on valid visas, just vanished and got absorbed in India? Why did they give up their ‘fearless environment’ and ‘first class citizenship status’ in Bangladesh and Pakistan respectively to court a life of ‘perpetual threat’ and a status of ‘second class citizenship’ in India?
(Concluded)
(The writer is a retired IAS officer)
e-mail the writer at vsundaram@newstodaynet.com
No comments:
Post a Comment